[relaxng-user] Re: [relax-ng-comment] common-atts

[K. Ari Krupnikov]

EB2M-MRT at asahi-net.or.jp (Murata Makoto) writes:

> If you write <element name="foo"><empty/></element>, you allow
> <foo></foo>.  If your write <element name="foo"><notAllowed/></element>,
> you allow nothing.

Thank you. I understand it now. What I wanted was an abstract declaration
for a type that elements may declare themselves to belong to, so
<notAllowed/> works. Is this the intended use of notAllowed?

Ari.