[relaxng-user] notAllowed

David Tolpin dvd at davidashen.net
Mon Dec 8 03:56:14 ICT 2003


why is notAllowed only allowed as a child of an element? I am asking because
I am trying to understand whether I will be able to validate against a grammar
without moving notAllowed to the top of an element's pattern?

On the other hand, if notAllowed is the only child of an element, can't that
element simply be removed from the grammar?


More information about the relaxng-user mailing list