[relaxng-user] implicit grammar

James Clark jjc at jclark.com
Fri Dec 5 08:31:18 ICT 2003

On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 06:13, David Tolpin wrote:
> Hi,
> What's the reason  behind not allowing implicit grammars in included schemas?

They are allowed.  Each file in a compact syntax schema is translated
individually to XML syntax. Each file is translated the same way whether
its the top level file, referenced in include or referenced in external.
The compact syntax schema is correct if the requirements of Appendix A
of the Compact Syntax spec are met and if the resulting XML syntax
schema is correct.


More information about the relaxng-user mailing list